Even the world’s most powerful figures are not immune to criticism, and this time the target is Elon Musk. In a headline-making statement, rock legend Mick Jagger publicly criticized Musk for failing to use his enormous wealth to address urgent global issues. According to Jagger, Musk has ignored major humanitarian crises such as world hunger, animal rescue efforts, and global emergencies, despite having more than enough resources to make a meaningful impact.
Jagger did not hesitate to label Musk’s inaction as “cowardly, useless, and contemptible.” These are powerful words that he rarely uses to refer to any individual, especially someone as influential as Musk. To the public, this highlights Jagger’s deep disappointment in how Musk chooses—or refuses—to use his hundreds of billions of dollars for humanitarian purposes.
According to analysts, Jagger’s criticism strikes at the heart of a long-standing debate: Do billionaires have a moral obligation to contribute more to society? As the wealth gap continues to grow, figures like Musk face increasing scrutiny over what they do—or do not do—to support their communities.
Musk, the CEO of Tesla, SpaceX, and owner of X, has long been perceived as someone more focused on futuristic technological projects than on immediate global issues. Jagger argues that this prioritization reveals an “ethical void,” as Musk appears to invest more energy in building his personal empire than in helping those who are suffering today.
The fact that Jagger personally voiced these criticisms drew even more attention, given that he is not known for involving himself in debates about the ultra-rich or political discourse. His remarks are seen as a voice representing a growing portion of the public that feels disappointed by Musk’s actions—and his silence—when it comes to humanitarian responsibilities.
Although Musk has the Musk Foundation and has announced various donations, many argue that these philanthropic efforts are too insignificant compared to his actual capacity. In particular, his earlier claim that he would “solve world hunger if the UN proved a plan,” followed by no meaningful action, remains a major source of controversy.
Jagger’s statement has not only fueled public debate but has also reignited broader discussions about the responsibility of the world’s wealthiest individuals in addressing global challenges. The public now awaits whether Musk will respond directly or remain silent in the face of these harsh accusations.
